Last night Joe Cienkowski blocked me. Again.But friends, let’s not be unhappy at such an incident.
I’m actually quite glad the fucking idiot has blocked me, it means I don’t have to endlessly repeat myself every five minutes before the idiot can’t understand basic things… like words.I was beginning to lose my patience at him anyway, and I guess asking eight (I think) times in one day proof that radiometric dating is wrong didn’t help.
I’ve been tweeted things by people like his love of peaches…
… his terrible chat up technique…
.. and his love of demonstrating that sending a link to Playboy constitutes evidence of “intelligent design”! (excuse the colour coding, I had to grab it from Google’s cache)
I mean Playboy, for fucks sake, no taste at all and all that shows in the main is that are surgeon’s out there who can do really good breast implants!
But I knew all this before hand. I knew he was a despicable person, I just wanted to keep the discussion civil.
It’s that’s not going to stop me following the plank, or blogging his best lines, which I admit I am well behind on. He’s still on my creationist-loons list I just watch it and laugh as his irrational, illogical and very poorly thought out arguments flood my screen.
Here are the question that I’m still waiting for answers for from @JoeCienkowski
Using the Berkley University definition of evolution is “descent with modification” which includes “changes in gene frequency in a population from one generation to the next” and “the descent of different species from a common ancestor over many generations”. Do you agree with that definition? If not, why not? Where is the “creation story” in evolutionary theory?
How the flood made faultlines?
Where is the evidence for a global flood?
What evidence the world was flat when the flood happened?
What evidence the rocks were malleable during the flood at that caused the mountains and valleys?
One peer reviewed creationist science paper?
Are the estimated six million scientists all wrong about everything?
Where in the theory of Evolution does it say “something came from nothing”?
Where in the theory of Evolution does it say imply bigger is better?
How can science test for God, for Genesis, talking snakes, walking on water and ressurection?
What is the contemporary evidence for the bible?
Why is every dating technique wrong?
Why are scientists lying about the dates from every dating technique?
You believe kent Hovind is a brilliant scientist, so would you trust being operated on by a surgeon with a similar PhD as he has?
Who are the “creationist scientists who are suppressed” and/or “shut out”?
In what schools are people “forced to believe in evolution”?
Isn’t being forced to believe in Christianity as a child just as bad?
I have the equlivent of $100 in my wallet at the moment, and I’ll donate it to charity of your choice if you can prove any of the wild accusations you’ve thrown at the scientific community today based on your belief that carbon dating is wrong and fixed to disprove the bible.
The ages were made to fit the preconceived notions of old ages
Carbon dating was the first scientific method.(5730 ½ life was made up figure) endlessly losing ½ life gives old age dates
I say you are a liar, gullible idiot whose swallowed Ken Ham’s bullshit wholesale and now acting as a sock puppet.
@robineccles I certainly believe the Holy Spirit has guided my work. All my work is based on proving Christ- God
Christianity is fucked then.
Aug 20 2010, 0:06 UTC
@StyxMaker . I don’t have to worry about evolution being true. The real question is what will you do when you find out evolution is false.
After 150 years, evolution is still going strong. After nine days of repeating this mantra of yours, you’ve STILL to provide ANY evidence against it.
Aug 20 2010, 0:18 UTC
@robineccles . Jesus fulfilled over 300 Old Testament prophecies. Said he was the Messiah. Did miracles to prove He was the Messiah.
Aug 20 2010, 0:20 UTC
@mibarroso Evolution is still unproved a unprovable. Evolution is not a fact but a theory that has been outdated.
Repeating this claim doesn’t make it any more right.
Aug 20 2010, 12:16 UTC
@Simply_bled Micro evolution is true science that can be tested and studied every single day. Creationists like to call it ‘variations’
Aug 20 2010, 12:23 UTC
@Golmer you’ll see that creationism is true science and the true reality of everything we see; Nothing unscientific about creationism
Where’s the papers? Where’s the peer review? Where’s the theory? Where’s the fucking evidence?
Aug 20 2010, 12:47 UTC
@ThatAtheistGuy microevolution is scientific and see it every day; macroevolution is religion and you must accept by faith
Blah blah blah
Aug 20 2010, 12:48 UTC
Abiogenesis is spontaneous generation repackaged for consumption but equally as absurd: distinction without a difference.
I’d love to live in Joe World.
Aug 20 2010, 12:57 UTC
@_7654_ No actually I am firmly a Christian. I seek to convert someone #atheist to theism. You never go backwards from Jesus
And do atheists “witness” Christians?
Aug 20 2010, 13:10 UTC
@renarde theory of creationism (Bible’s account) much more fits the evidence of what we see every day than the theory of evolution
Name one bit of evidence that fits the Bible completely. Just one.
Aug 20 2010, 13:10 UTC
@renarde you may believe that evolution is science, but I’ve proven my book that evolution is religion. If the atheism’s creation story
Atheism isn’t creation dickhead.
Aug 20 2010, 13:12 UTC
#ChristianS, the bottom line answer is we can Fully Rely On God (FROG) even believing in a literal Adam and Eve
Yeah of course. No DNA bottleneck, you’re “theory” is fucked.
Aug 20 2010, 13:26 UTC
@MyDarlingCecily Genesis 6:15; Ark is to be 450 feet long/75 feet wide/45 feet high (could have been bigger if cubit was bigger back then)
Aug 20 2010, 14:03 UTC
@p3n7agram don’t you know that scientists go into the field with an evolutionary bias, as they were force-fed evolution in first grade?
One example would be nice.
Aug 20 2010, 14:07 UTC
@StyxMaker how exactly did the solar system form? (that keeps perfect time, 365 days a year, 24 hours a day, winter spring summer fall)
I think you’ll find humans crammed the time into the natural cycle of the universe, hence the leap year, the leap second, etc.
Aug 20 2010, 14:12 UTC
@LarryLovesJesus I believe in the Big Bang. God said it and ‘Bang’ it happened
Fuck, rewrite the science books! Joe’s cracked it.
Aug 20 2010, 14:26 UTC
@p3n7agram absolutely they are real scientists. You are the ones who out of hand discounts them because they believe in creationism
This is a reference to the ICR, AIG and Discovery Institute. The really world famous scientists who have come up with the Wedge Strategy and Irreducible Complexity, which is a solid theory. Solid in the sense of a wet paper towel. So what science journals has these “scientists” published in recently?
Aug 20 2010, 14:48 UTC
@Simply_bled I’m actually the perfect spokesman for creationism, Christianity. God created science AND the #Bible
They’re all fucked as well.
Aug 20 2010, 15:20 UTC
@ThatAtheistGuy #Bible has many different authors, but all were guided by God the Holy Spirit, therefore w/o error historically & factually
Didn’t Luke, Matthew and John either copy Mark wholesale or plagiarise it to death?
Aug 20 2010, 15:39 UTC
@StyxMaker and why are there galaxies suns out there spinning backwards
Aug 20 2010, 15:51 UTC
@AnnraoiOD your macroevolution implies that something turned into a dog; INTO a wolf. This is where it turns religious
Aug 20 2010, 16:05 UTC
@StyxMaker don’t give me that crap. You can study medicine perfectly fine without believing in evolution. Luke was a doctor
And a crap writer. Allegedly.
Aug 20 2010, 16:06 UTC
@CapnAlex it is foolish to think you must believe in evolution to study biology, chemistry, zoology, cosmology, physiology
Aug 20 2010, 16:16 UTC
@Golmer you can study chemistry, anatomy and physiology , without even bringing evolution into it. they are true fields of science.
Aug 20 2010, 16:18 UTC
@CapnAlex you can study biology all day long without the word ‘evolution’ ever coming to mind. Many things we can study about life
When was the last time you picked up a book dealing with biology. Or anything to do with science?
Aug 20 2010, 16:19 UTC
@jeanybeany80 Jesus did know I’d be speaking on His behalf and warned me that I will be persecuted for His sake. (Matt 5)
And I’d bet he hasn’t been more pissed off since being nailed to a cross. Allegedly.
Aug 20 2010, 16:21 UTC
@Golmer I believe in evolution until I was 30 years old. It was actually for scientific reasons I abandoned evolution
And what were those earth shattering “scientific reasons”? It turned out to be a Ken Ham DVD hahahaha
Aug 20 2010, 16:22 UTC
@Golmer evolution is a made-up theory to give ‘scientific justification’ to reject God. You somehow think it’s science, but it’s not
People rejected god before evolution.
Aug 20 2010, 16:24 UTC
@Golmer evolution and biology really have nothing to do with each other. Biology is science of life; existing life; and in observable past
I think you’ll find it is.
Aug 20 2010, 18:16 UTC
@persephone419 I don’t know how anybody cannot like Sarah Palin. She’s bright,intelligent has common sense fearsGod; loves her country
Aug 20 2010, 18:22 UTC
@persephone419 there is some reason the left fears Sarah Palin. Most ordinary down to earth people love Sarah
Aug 20 2010, 18:24 UTC
@persephone419 Fox audience is the most diverse audience.
If you like your audience to be right wing fundementalist christians, then yes, it’s really diverse.
Aug 20 2010, 18:28 UTC
This war on #atheism on the battlefield of ideas, I am refuting the belief system of atheism by show the impossibility of the implications
O’Hara, who comes from Philadelphia, was questioned by police while still wearing the clothes covered in the boy’s blood. O’Hara’s son, who was called Rory, had been brought to visit all the way from Baltimore by his mother.
“The guy was giving me problems. That is why I kill him. Sir, what if he really is the devil?” O’Hara asked the police. The police Detective then asked O’Hara specifically if he thought Rory, had been the devil and O’Hara replied “Yes.”