@JoeCienkowski: Hitler used children, disarmed Germany

that's-bollocks

The Weimar Republic had some of the toughest laws against gun control, mostly thanks to the terms of the Versailles treaty.

Enter the Nazi’s, and the 1938‚ German Weapons Act which relaxed the laws so you could own a gun at 18 instead of 20, permits updated every three years instead of one year and the exemptions from any gun control applied to millions of people. Oh and Jews were forbidden to own guns.

You lying fundamentalist fucker Joe.

So fucking retarded, even Jesus thinks you're a fucking loser
So fucking retarded, even Jesus thinks you’re a fucking loser

@joecienkowski speaks with ill-founded confidence on dinosaurs

[blackbirdpie url=”http://twitter.com/#!/JoeCienkowski/status/127021582186053632″]

Oh really?

Are you sure about that Peachy?

Well perhaps you could explain what the NUMEROUS examples of what we would call “feathers” are around the dozens of fossils are. No rush, I know you’re incompetent researcher.

I know you prefer Yahoo Answers as a reliable source, but I prefer Wikipedia who has a good article on feathered dinos.

@joecienkowski conversion rate

I haven’t mention this fuckwitt for a while, mainly because I feel having a go constantly at Peachy is like beating up a defenceless animal.

So when @WestonLockley posts:

[blackbirdpie url=”http://twitter.com/#!/WestonLockley/statuses/125558544077553664″]

… “a light went off in the inside of my head” (that was a quote from Joe Cienkowski’s Grand Reality pamphlet, lots of jokes there to borrow). If anyone has bothered to go to Peachy’s Twitter home and managed not to self harm from reading his tweets, you should look at his lists. Predictably he has two, one atheist and one christian.

But what’s that as a description on the atheist list?

You’re shitting me? Yep, Peachy, as well as being Christianity’s “chief apologist” is also on a one man mission to convert Atheists. So after 45,000 tweets, how many conversions?

To the knowledge of Twitter, there has been a massive TWO conversions that can be attributed directly to Joe Cienkowski, but before you congratulate him there is a little detail that I missed.

The two conversions are from Christians and Agnostics AWAY from Christianity, not too it.

So, congratulations Peachy. Four self-published book fails, one wrecked marriage, one leaky trailer park trash roof, big debts, 45,000+ tweets, 1,100+ followers (who are mostly atheists taking the piss) and you’ve driven away two people.

I’ve suddenly fallen in love with bookmarklets again

bookmarklets

I thought I’d share these as I find them incredibly useful for social sharing especially.

Click and drag the bold header text onto your favourites bar.

Stumble This!

Springpad

Saves either a text selection or bookmarks the URL

Share on Twitter

Share on Google+

Share on Facebook

Share on Tumblr

Note to Google Reader

Find Similar Pages

Send it with GMail

Google Notebook This

Google definition

Finds the definition of text selection.

Goo.gl This Page!

Gives you a short url for the current page

Google Site Search

Opens a site:url of the page you’re viewing

Search Wikipedia

Search the Wikipedia with current selection of text or enter text in selection box

Validate HTML

Validate CSS

Strip CSS

Removes all style sheets on current URL

Yay! @JoeCienkowski has finished his new pamphlet, I mean book

You know that because he’s whoring himself around the internet again.

[blackbirdpie id=”111385477273223168″]

I can’t wait to read it.

After the enduring mental torture and self-harming reading his previous pieces of shite, Jesus Christ is God (or whatever it’s called), Atheism is a Religion (or whatever it’s called) and the Grand Delusion Reality (or whatever it’s called), I’m hoping he’ll actually prove at the end of this book what he sets out to do on page 1 of it.

A tenner he mentions he’s a convicted drug dealer in the introduction. Any takers?

I’ll also wager it’s a complete rip off of Your People Shall Be My People by Don Finto.

Dear Mr. Murdoch

Dear Mr. Murdoch, what have you done
With your news of the screws and your soaraway sun?
You sharpen our hatred
You’ve blunted our minds
We’re drowning in nipples and bingo and sex crimes
How many time must they poke and they pry
Must they twist and lie?
Just to add to the grime they even screwed up the times
Love to kick their arse goodbye oh wouldn’t i!

Dear Mr. Murdoch you play hard to see
But with your bare-arsed cheek you should be on page three
And dear Mr. Murdoch you’re really the pits
Bad news is good business, you’re the king of the tits

They stain all they touch, they’re real woman haters
But we’re on their trail
They go straight for the lowest common denominators
How could they fail? go straight to jail – (no bail)!

Dear Mr. Murdoch you’re a powerful man
You control half our media whose values don’t scan
And dear Mr. Murdoch we’re not so amused
Just line up the people whose lives they’ve abused

Dear Mr. Murdoch what do you know
With your minions like vultures and carrion crow
They’ve sunk just as low as humans can sink
For profit they tell us how mass murderers think

And dear Mr. Murdoch you come down from on high
You even bought up the air waves, you control all our sky

Dear Mr. Murdoch you’re a dangerous chap
With your jingoist lingo we’re drowning in crap

Dear Mr. Murdoch where are you coming from?
Getting so hard to tell if you’re a yank, oz or pom

Dear Mr. Murdoch you’re really the pits
Bad news is good business, you’re the king of the tits

Dear Mr. Murdoch you do it with zing
At lowering the standards you’re really the king

And dear Mr. Murdoch what have you done?
You’re not quite as nice as attila the hun

“Evolution isn’t hard to understand” says Joe Cienkowski. Oh really?

No Peachy, you don’t understand it. Despite the many years of people patiently trying to explain it to you, you STILL haven’t got a fucking clue. There is no excuse for your level of stupidity. I know you don’t like being called stupid, but I use that word not as an insult but because, unlike you, I can backup my statements with facts. And I’ll do it using your own words.

Grand Reality, page 1

“common ancestry, and abiogenesis are all part of the theory of evolution” No they’re not.

Page 5,

“But, instead of giving God the glory, it is given to ‘time and chance’ or nature.” Time and chance are nothing to do with evolution. Show where it says that.

Page 6,

“this will also prove clearly, convincingly and compellingly that humans and apes have no common ancestors” Nope. Read up on DNA some time.

Page 7,

“Since you believe something we never see, evolution, you must also believe in abiogenesis, something we never see” Nope, http://scholar.google.co.uk/scholar?q=observations+of+evolution&hl=en&as_sdt=0&as_vis=1&oi=scholart and http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Evidence_of_common_descent and http://www.talkorigins.org/faqs/faq-speciation.html and http://www.talkorigins.org/faqs/speciation.html just for starters.

Page 7-8

“Do you know the unbelievable changes that would’ve had to have happened without guidance? The would’ve had to have evolved, as well as the heart, lungs, blood, bones, male and female distinctions, systems of the body, simultaneously.” Just… wow!

Page 8,

“Atheists like to say …abiogenesis and evolution are two different things. You can’t compare them”. I don’t believe this is the case since;” What you believe is irrelevant. Abiogenesis is how life started, evolutionary biology is how life evolved.

And now I’ve lost the will to live reading your book, but it’s just simple examples of why you don’t know what evolution is at the most basic level, and even worse, you have no idea what the scientific method is that has shown evolution to be a fact.

  1. You propose an explanation for an observed phenomenon (a hypothesis).
  2. You formulate a method to test said hypothesis.
  3. You run said tests.
  4. You publish the results and the method used to test so that the results can be verified.
  5. Such verification occurs. If it stands it gains credence in the scientific community. if it doesn’t, the hypothesis is rejected.

So again, I call you stupid not because I want to insult you, but because it’s a fact, as much as evolution is a fact.

Evolution isn’t hard to understand, so says Joe Cienkowski who should know better

Evolution isn't hard to understand... unless your Joe Cienkowski!

No Peachy, you don’t understand it. We’ve explained it to you for a year and you STILL haven’t got a clue. There is no excuse for your level of stupidity. I know you don’t like being called stupid, but I use that word not as an insult but because, unlike you, I can backup my statements with facts. And I’ll do it using your own words.

Grand Reality, page 1

“common ancestry, and abiogenesis are all part of the theory of evolution” No they’re not.

Page 5,

“But, instead of giving God the glory, it is given to ‘time and chance’ or nature.” Time and chance are nothing to do with evolution. Show where it says that.

Page 6,

“this will also prove clearly, convincingly and compellingly that humans and apes have no common ancestors” Nope. Read up on DNA some time.

Page 7,

“Since you believe something we never see, evolution, you must also believe in abiogenesis, something we never see” Nope, http://scholar.google.co.uk/scholar?q=observations+of+evolution&hl=en&as_sdt=0&as_vis=1&oi=scholart and http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Evidence_of_common_descent and http://www.talkorigins.org/faqs/faq-speciation.html and http://www.talkorigins.org/faqs/speciation.html just for starters.

Page 7-8

“Do you know the unbelievable changes that would’ve had to have happened without guidance? The would’ve had to have evolved, as well as the heart, lungs, blood, bones, male and female distinctions, systems of the body, simultaneously.” Just… wow!

Page 8,

“Atheists like to say “abiogenesis and evolution are two different things. You can’t compare them”. I don’t believe this is the case since;” What you believe is irrelevant. Abiogenesis is how life started, evolutionary biology is how life evolved.

And now I’ve lost the will to live reading your book, but it’s just simple examples of why you don’t know what evolution is at the most basic level, and even worse, you have no idea what the scientific method is that has shown evolution to be a fact.

  1. You propose an explanation for an observed phenomenon (a hypothesis).
  2. You formulate a method to test said hypothesis.
  3. You run said tests.
  4. You publish the results and the method used to test so that the results can be verified.
  5. Such verification occurs. If it stands it gains credence in the scientific community. if it doesn’t, the hypothesis is rejected.

So again, I call you stupid not because I want to insult you, but because it’s a fact, as much as evolution is a fact.

In case that’s not enough to prove your STUPIDITY, there’s a whole showcase here… http://xiantwits.com/JoeCienkowski

Bored

I’’ve always enjoyed writing. I’ve got dozens of unfinished short stories going back nearly two decades.

During my therapy, my shrink suggested that I find and outlet for my frustration and anger instead of bottling it up and letting it fuck up my life.

Ok I thought, I’ll give it ago so that’s when I started blogging, then I was conned, well that’s how I see it anyway, onto Facebook. Even now I fucking hate that web site. I don’t document my life and I’m as anti-social as they come so why the hell am I on Facebook?!

So once I got bored of that shite, I moved on to Twitter. After a few months of irritation at the pointlessness of it all, I left it. Then I rejoined. Then I left again, mainly because it just seemed I dealt with fundie fuckwitts and atheism 24/7 on there.

I’m now on account number three, with a fresh determination to keep out of #atheism/#atheist and refusing to be drawn into other people’s battles.

And after two days, I’m bored shitless of it all again.

I’ve either turned into what you’d a boring cunt, or hurtling towards 40 has turned me into just giving a shit about anything or anyone.